Wealth and the Economy
When it comes to the economy, the most misunderstood concept deals with wealth. Wealth and more importantly, wealth creation is the engine to any sustainably healthy economy. As a result, there are many misconceptions to what ultimately allows for a healthy economy. These misconceptions tend to make many look to simply stimulate the indicators of a healthy economy instead of laying the foundation for one. This of course, only gives the appearance of fixing economic woes, instead of addressing the underlying issues.
What is Wealth?
In order to know how to create wealth, we have to know what wealth actually is. Many look at an economy as a zero sum game. Where there is only a limited amount of wealth similar to a poker game, where one person can only win, if another loses. However, this is not how wealth works. Wealth should not be looked at as any one thing such as paper money. Indeed, that can be representative of wealth, in the way that someone’s net worth can be calculated in US Dollars. However, wealth in the economic sense of the term is ultimately anything that has economic value. In a society that protects private property rights, wealth is created, not won at the expense of others.
Most importantly, wealth can only be created through production. A simple example of this is that of a baker and shoe maker. The baker can bake bread and the shoe maker can make shoes. Both of these products have real value and each tradesman can presumably create more product than they and their family can consume or need. The excess can either be exchanged, given away or stored as wealth. Money is introduced into this equation as matter of both necessity and convenience. Since, the baker’s goods will eventually go bad and the shoe maker’s shoes may eventually go out of style or otherwise degrade. The excess wealth that is produced can be exchanged for money to be stored for later use. Money allows for one to produce more than what is presently needed and store the additional amount of wealth that is created but not used. However, for something to be considered money, it must have a few important qualities. Money must be a medium of exchange, unit of account and perhaps most important, a store of value.
Fiat Currency and Wealth
Modern currency such as the US dollar surprisingly does not hold all of these properties, because it is not backed by anything of value and therefore can be simply printed in order to fund programs and pay debts. Paper currency that is not backed by anything of value is known as Fiat currency. Fiat currency in fact is very similar to a depreciable asset. Since the tendency of governments or institutions in control of a paper currency is to print more of it, it does not properly store its value. The US dollar has lost 96% of its value over the last 100 years. That means if the shoe maker sold his excess shoes and stored their wealth in the US dollar in 1910, they would be left with $4 dollars of purchasing power for every $100 that they saved.
Fiat currency has been used for centuries and even dates back to the Ming Dynasty in 100 AD. In its history it has always lost value. Paper currency can act as money, but it must be a receipt for something of real value or a standard of real wealth so that the paper currency cannot be printed or issued unless there is a real asset to back it up.
Paper currency has played a major role in our economy for the last 100 years. We have slowly removed ourselves from the ‘gold standard’, where our paper currency was a receipt for gold or silver. The resulting system of fiat currency has been a lynch pin to our economic instability for the past century. It has been used to manipulate economies and fund social projects and wars that the US cannot truly afford in comparison to its true wealth production. While the US has forced manufacturing and other bases of wealth creation to other countries with taxes, regulation and wage controls; the US has maintained its standard of living through debt and printed currency. The US has simply been living beyond its means by ultimately borrowing wealth from future generations.
Economic Stimulus via Debt and Fiat Currency
When economic troubles begin to take root, the government typically responds by injecting more money into the system to keep it going. Again, this money is not true wealth; it is simply the appearance of wealth. In addition, it is the distribution of wealth as described by Vladimir Lenin who said, “By a continuing process of inflation governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens.”
Many falsely believe that the government has an infinite amount money, because it can have the Fed print it and lend it to the US government. While the government does have access to a seemingly endless supply of paper currency, it does not have access of an endless supply of wealth. Money may not grow on trees, but paper currency apparently does. Through an economic theory called Keynesian economics, government spending is justified in order to “prime” the economy when all other options are said to be exhausted. The problem with this theory, is that contrary to many politicians’ and economists’ beliefs, the US government will eventually run out of credit if it simply continues to borrow. In addition, the US dollar loses value every time another dollar is printed and put into the system.
When the government tries to stimulate the economy through spending, it acts similar to a millionaire in a small town that is hit by a natural disaster which cripples that town’s ability to generate wealth. As a result, wealth production would suffer until the town rebuilds. The millionaire could begin to give money to their neighbors to help them buy products again and spend money in local stores, which could help ’stimulate’ those businesses. Further, when the millionaire runs out of money, he could start to borrow more on his good name and give that money to the townspeople as well. However, if that town does not find a way to begin producing enough wealth again, eventually that millionaire will be left penniless and bankrupt; and the entire town will be as well.
This is exactly what the US government has been doing for over 75 years. In an attempt to rescue suffering economies, they look to simply stimulate the appearance of a healthy economy by injecting “money” into the system with debt and printed currency. This does provide temporary relief by artificially stimulating job creation, but like the millionaire in the example before, it does nothing to actually address the underlying problem, which is the loss of wealth production. It doesn’t actually solve the problem, it only masks the symptoms.
Note: there is a difference between the millionaire in this example and the government. The millionaire would be using their own money, which presumably they did not take by force. In addition, unlike the debt which is accumulated by the millionaire, the debt generated by government is owed by the American tax payer in the end.
Jobs Created or ‘Saved’
Many look to simply create jobs in order to ‘stimulate’ the economy. The logic with this simply suggests that if jobs are created and wages are paid, then those employed will spend money on domestic goods and services. This demand for goods and services will then in turn create more jobs. This all sounds good, but the question is how to create jobs in a depressed economy? Government is the logical candidate, because in cooperation with the Federal Reserve Bank or other lenders, it is able to borrow money and operate at a deficit in order to spend money necessary to create these jobs. This is a part of the Keynesian theory of economics known as demand side economics. The father of Keynesian economics best summed up his theory with the following example: You can pay someone to dig a hole and pay someone else to fill it. The fact that nothing productive is occurring doesn’t matter. The spending alone stimulates the economy.
What is missed in this theory is the fact that government does not create wealth. So, it cannot spend money on anything, including job creation, that it does not first take from the economy either through taxes or debt. In most cases, debt is used in lieu of taxes, because it is less destructive to the indicators of health for the current economy and it also allows politicians to simply pass the tax burden and resulting economic repercussions onto future generations. Keep in mind, when money is borrowed from the Federal Reserve, that money is simply printed. When more paper currency is arbitrarily introduced into the system, this is known as inflation. Inflation should be viewed as an additional tax, because inflation erodes the value of savings. The result then of creating jobs via printed money is simply inflation and an increased national debt. In the end, it doesn’t matter how many jobs that are created or saved, if wealth creation has not been restored, nothing has been done to solve the underlying problem.
Returning to Prosperity
An economy is simply a system where capital, labor and resources are exchanged. A healthy economy is simply one where the process of exchange is occurring at some nominal frequency. It may be obvious that exchange cannot occur unless there is something to be exchanged. That is why production; or wealth creation, is the basis of a sustainably healthy economy. As production and subsequent exchange increases, more labor is needed in order to fulfill the demand for further exchange. As simple demands are meet for things like food, clothes and basic shelter, as well as increases in efficiencies increases the over all wealth production of the nation, excess wealth is then available for luxury items and even services, thus furthering economic expansion. Simply trying to create jobs does not necessarily translate into wealth production, however, to the contrary an increase of wealth creation does lead to more jobs.
America used to be a massive center of wealth creation in the world, which produced low cost, high quality goods. Unfortunately, we have taxed and regulated our production centers to the point that many are operating overseas. Everything from manufacturing to domestic energy production has plummeted over the last 50 years, especially relative to demand. If we are to see a return to true prosperity in America, we must look to once again being a leader in wealth creation. This does not happen by the Federal government doing more; instead we need for the Federal government to do less. Private business and individuals through the freedom of enterprise is the only path to a sustainable and efficient economy, and therefore, true prosperity.
